Is it possible to communicate with God?
Risk
of distortion with the use of "Abba," Father
To start with I must say that we cannot
have a dialogue with God as with another human being. We may address God with
words, thoughts, desires, petitions, and we may "hear" his answer
inside us; but all this is happening in our minds only. So, the question is
this: can we really reach God, communicate with him and be answered by him? Let
us see.
Communication with God is through
faith
From a solely natural point of view we
cannot communicate beyond the physical environment. If God exists, he is by
nature inaccessible and we cannot reach him. This is what simple nature tells
us.
When we intend to talk about communication
with God, we are exiting the natural order. As in other subjects that we have
discussed in these pages, we are entering here the realm of the supernatural
world. Only by revelation can we know any order beyond nature, and only by
faith can we communicate with that world.
God as a personal God
I used to say every day in my Preparation
for talking with God, that "He has been, is and will be Being,
Existence, Life, Action, Energy, Power, Kindness, Love, Wisdom, but only by
revelation can we know him as a God who communicates and dialogues with
us." (You may see the whole Preparation, here.)
I am saying here that only by revelation
may we know that God is a person (analogically). I said in another document
that it is more adequate to say that God is personal, instead of a
person. We believe by the revelation of Jesus that God is a personal God,
a communicative Being.
Communication with God is a
supernatural action
We, human beings, may communicate only
with persons; and God being a person, or personal, we may communicate with him.
But this action is not a man's natural action, but a supernatural
action, because it is done in faith.
Human beings prefer to communicate with a
God who is able to "hear," to understand and to answer them, instead
of with an abstract entity. It is more reasonable to say that God is personal,
than to think that he is an impersonal, mute, deaf and blind entity, as many
physicists and philosophers say.
More in the book
Back to Directory